Permanent program record

Fred Hutch / Caladan HSV gene editing

Preclinical program with HSV-1 mouse latent-load and induced-shedding evidence plus an HSV-2 translational award; no named human candidate or trial, and post-award activity is unclear.

Developer / organization
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · Caladan Therapeutics
Intervention type
Gene editing
Current stage
Preclinical
Status unclear

Sources last checked

Summary

Bottom line

Researchers at Fred Hutch and the associated company Caladan Therapeutics are developing a potentially curative HSV gene-editing approach that uses AAV vectors to deliver HSV-specific meganucleases to infected nerve cells.

The strongest public evidence is still from HSV-1 mouse studies. Those studies reported large reductions in latent viral DNA and less experimentally induced shedding, but also identified dose-related liver toxicity and subtle neuronal injury in some settings. No human candidate or trial was identified through September 1, 2026.

Plain-language overview

What is this?

Meganucleases are engineered enzymes that cut selected DNA sequences. In this program, adeno-associated virus vectors carry the enzymes into peripheral neurons so they can damage essential HSV DNA and reduce the latent viral reservoir.

The program is sometimes described generically as CRISPR gene editing, but its lead published animal strategy uses meganucleases. The public studies tested several enzyme combinations, AAV serotypes, promoters, and doses; no final human-ready product or product code was disclosed.

Research goal

What were researchers trying to accomplish?

The goal is to move beyond temporary suppression by directly reducing latent HSV DNA in ganglia. A separate NIH-funded Caladan/Fred Hutch project aimed to adapt the platform to HSV-2 by selecting a lead HSV-2 meganuclease and testing activity and safety in a guinea-pig model.

Study and program

What happened?

A 2020 mouse study established that optimized dual-meganuclease delivery could reduce latent HSV-1 DNA in multiple ganglia more effectively than several single-site approaches. A 2024 study extended the work to genital and orofacial HSV-1 infection models and measured induced peripheral shedding as well as latent viral load.

Fred Hutch said in March 2025 that the team was working through preclinical studies needed before testing in human volunteers. The identified NIH small-business project ended on July 31, 2026. No newer direct source established that the wider program stopped or continued after that funding period.

Reported findings

What did the study find?

In the 2024 paper, some dual-meganuclease and triple-AAV experiments reduced latent HSV-1 DNA by 90% or more in mouse ganglia, with a reported reduction up to about 97% in one genital-infection model. Results varied by ganglion, dose, vector configuration, and experiment, and residual viral DNA remained.

Across combined mouse experiments using a drug to induce HSV-1 reactivation, treated animals were less likely to have detectable peripheral shedding than controls. Individual experiments were small and often did not reach statistical significance; the combined analysis reported an odds ratio of 0.41 with p=0.010.

At high AAV/meganuclease doses, about 10% of treated animals showed clinical signs consistent with liver toxicity, and histology showed subtle neuronal injury in some settings. Lower doses, a neuron-specific promoter, and simplified vector configurations improved observed tolerability while retaining animal activity.

HSVHQ interpretation

What does that mean?

This is a potentially curative preclinical program because it targets latent viral DNA rather than only active replication. That category does not mean a cure has been demonstrated: partial reservoir reduction in mice is not proof of a sterilizing or functional cure in people.

The shedding result is also animal evidence. It does not show prevention of recurrences or transmission between people, and the safety findings make dose, distribution, off-target activity, and neuronal tolerability central development questions.

Evidence gaps

What don't we know?

Program status

Why did or didn't development continue?

The public evidence supports a preclinical stage. Because the named HSV-2 award had ended shortly before September 1, 2026, and no newer direct progress or discontinuation statement was identified, the wider program's current operating status is unclear rather than confirmed active or abandoned.

Confirmed next steps

What happens next?

A credible next update would identify the HSV-2 lead and executed animal results, a finalized delivery configuration, safety and biodistribution evidence, follow-on funding, or a registered first-in-human study. None had been confirmed as of September 1, 2026.

Program record

Organizations
Fred Hutch Cancer Center (Collaborator (current), Developer (current), Originator (current))Caladan Therapeutics (Collaborator (current), Developer (current))
Goal
Potentially eliminate latent HSV
Approach
AAV-delivered HSV-specific meganucleases intended to reduce latent viral DNA in peripheral neurons
Intended HSV scope
HSV-1 + HSV-2
Human evidence scope
No human evidence
Studied indication / setting
Latent reservoir
Current stage
Preclinical
Evidence maturity

Preclinical evidence

This describes the strongest research evidence in the sources HSVHQ reviewed. Development stage, regulatory review, and availability are shown separately.

Development history

Timeline

  1. Identified HSV-2 STTR period ended

    The named NIH HSV-2 project reached its listed project end date.

    Why it matters: Does not establish completion, success, continuation, or discontinuation of the wider program.

  2. Updated HSV-1 animal study published

    Nature Communications reported latent-load, induced-shedding, and safety optimization results.

    Why it matters: Defines the strongest public evidence and major safety gap.

Technical record

Study details

The dual approach used enzymes cutting different essential HSV-1 genes, while a simplified approach used one meganuclease aimed at a duplicated viral region. AAV9, AAV-Dj/8, and AAV-Rh10 were among the delivery vectors evaluated.

The published efficacy data used HSV-1, including mice infected genitally with HSV-1. That is not HSV-2 evidence. The NIH HSV-2 award describes planned lead selection, guinea-pig testing, off-target analysis, chromosomal-translocation testing, and vector-sequence integration testing, but it does not report the results of those aims.

No published human trials are linked.

Primary sources first

Evidence and sources

Trial registries document study plans and status. Journal articles and conference abstracts report scientific findings. Company reports are listed separately because they come from organizations with a stake in the program.

  1. 1. Researcher statement
    Drs. Keith Jerome and Jesse Bloom elected fellows of American Academy of Microbiology

    Fred Hutch News Service · Fred Hutch Cancer Center

  2. 2. Clinical trial registry
    ClinicalTrials.gov search for Caladan Therapeutics

    ClinicalTrials.gov

  3. 3. Peer-reviewed study
    Gene editing for latent herpes simplex virus infection reduces viral load and shedding in vivo

    Martine Aubert; Keith Jerome; colleagues · Nature Communications

    DOI 10.1038/s41467-024-47940-y · PMID 38740820

  4. 4. Peer-reviewed study
    Gene editing and elimination of latent herpes simplex virus in vivo

    Martine Aubert; Keith Jerome; colleagues · Nature Communications

    DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-17936-5 · PMID 32811834

  5. 5. Government health source
    Meganuclease-mediated gene editing for durable control of HSV-2 infection

    Keith R. Jerome · NIH RePORTER